CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018: Difference between revisions
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project Juniper:Bookmark Enhancements]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1803: Introducing a Student View for Instructors]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1804: OSS project Yellow: Topic management]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE_517_Spring_2018- Project E1805: Convolutional data extraction from Github]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1808: Refactor review_mapping_controller.rb]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1810: Show sample submissions and reviews]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018/E1814 Write unit tests for collusion cycle.rb]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project M1802: 2D Canvas Rendering]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project M1802: 2D Canvas Rendering (Part 2)]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018 - E1800: Add past-due assignments to task list]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1812: on the fly calc.rb]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project M1803: Implement a web page fuzzer to find rendering mismatches ]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project M1803: Implement a web page fuzzer to find rendering mismatches (Part 2)]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018/E1813 Test Menu Items Model]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1816: Visualization for Instructors]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1817: Adding Student-generated Questions to Rubric]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1818:  Role-based reviewing]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1822: Extend the functionality of badging]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1815: Improvements to review grader]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1824: Let course staff as well as students do reviews]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1819: Improve self review, link self and peer review to derive grades]]  | |||
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1820 Review-Comment Tone Analysis Report]]  | |||
==Issues==  | ==Issues==  | ||
Latest revision as of 17:35, 6 June 2018
- CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project Juniper:Bookmark Enhancements
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1803: Introducing a Student View for Instructors
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1804: OSS project Yellow: Topic management
 - CSC/ECE_517_Spring_2018- Project E1805: Convolutional data extraction from Github
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1808: Refactor review_mapping_controller.rb
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1810: Show sample submissions and reviews
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018/E1814 Write unit tests for collusion cycle.rb
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project M1802: 2D Canvas Rendering
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project M1802: 2D Canvas Rendering (Part 2)
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018 - E1800: Add past-due assignments to task list
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1812: on the fly calc.rb
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project M1803: Implement a web page fuzzer to find rendering mismatches
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project M1803: Implement a web page fuzzer to find rendering mismatches (Part 2)
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018/E1813 Test Menu Items Model
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1816: Visualization for Instructors
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1817: Adding Student-generated Questions to Rubric
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1818: Role-based reviewing
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1822: Extend the functionality of badging
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1815: Improvements to review grader
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1824: Let course staff as well as students do reviews
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1819: Improve self review, link self and peer review to derive grades
 - CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1820 Review-Comment Tone Analysis Report
 
Issues
Problem 1:
When an instructor is logged in, they can manage rubrics under the Manage > Questionnaires tab. However, bookmark ratings are not available to be selected.

Enhancements to the problem:
An instructor can now see ‘Bookmark reviews’ in the Manage > Questionnaires drop down menu.
Problem 2
The current functionality only allows for the author to review the bookmark, and the reviewer is not able to assess the usefulness of a bookmark.
Enhancements to the problem:
The design below could be implemented to allow for input from reviewers on bookmarks. This would involve modification to the existing classes to add “karma points,” which are points a