Talk:CSC/ECE 506 Spring 2013/10c dz: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Almost all of the changes in this section consist of adding text to cover additional topics. While some readers may benefit from that, I think most will be overwhelmed by the lo...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Almost all of the changes in this section consist of adding text to cover additional topics. While some readers may benefit from that, I think most will be overwhelmed by the long list of models with no clear organization. For example, there are several sections on performance of various models; not all models are included, nor is it clear why some have been excluded. My impression is that the comparisons were taken from papers, rather than being written explicitly for this chapter. | Almost all of the changes in this section consist of adding text to cover additional topics. While some readers may benefit from that, I think most will be overwhelmed by the long list of models with no clear organization. For example, there are several sections on performance of various models; not all models are included, nor is it clear why some have been excluded. My impression is that the comparisons were taken from papers, rather than being written explicitly for this chapter. | ||
Two reviewers also stated that most of the papers were old, and asked for more recent comparisons. | |||
A quiz has been added at the end. That is good. | A quiz has been added at the end. That is good. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:36, 29 April 2014
Almost all of the changes in this section consist of adding text to cover additional topics. While some readers may benefit from that, I think most will be overwhelmed by the long list of models with no clear organization. For example, there are several sections on performance of various models; not all models are included, nor is it clear why some have been excluded. My impression is that the comparisons were taken from papers, rather than being written explicitly for this chapter.
Two reviewers also stated that most of the papers were old, and asked for more recent comparisons.
A quiz has been added at the end. That is good.