Talk:CSC/ECE 506 Spring 2014/10c qq: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Several glitches in formatting have been fixed in this version. But the main changes are additions of material on various models, as mentioned in the "Wiki 10c plan." Since these are essentially just dropped into the existing text, it's difficult to see why they were covered in that particular order. The next revision could do a big service by reorganizing these models in some kind of coherent fashion. | Several glitches in formatting have been fixed in this version. But the main changes are additions of material on various models, as mentioned in the "Wiki 10c plan." Since these are essentially just dropped into the existing text, it's difficult to see why they were covered in that particular order. The next revision could do a big service by reorganizing these models in some kind of coherent fashion. | ||
Further, a reviewer has a concern that text has just been copied into the document from newly cited works. | Further, a reviewer has a concern that text has just been copied into the document from newly cited works. I wasn't able to find this; it seems that slight edits have been performed. But, text that is appropriate for one discussion may not be appropriate for another. It really should be rewritten to fit the context of this discussion. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:23, 29 April 2014
Several glitches in formatting have been fixed in this version. But the main changes are additions of material on various models, as mentioned in the "Wiki 10c plan." Since these are essentially just dropped into the existing text, it's difficult to see why they were covered in that particular order. The next revision could do a big service by reorganizing these models in some kind of coherent fashion.
Further, a reviewer has a concern that text has just been copied into the document from newly cited works. I wasn't able to find this; it seems that slight edits have been performed. But, text that is appropriate for one discussion may not be appropriate for another. It really should be rewritten to fit the context of this discussion.