CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2013/oss E818 mra: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(52 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=E818 Refactoring and testing -- analytics= | =E818 Refactoring and testing -- analytics= | ||
This Wiki page provides a detailed description of the Open Source Software project conducted on Expertiza, as part of the Object Oriented Languages and Systems coursework. | |||
== | =Introduction to Expertiza= | ||
[http://expertiza.ncsu.edu/ Expertiza] is an open source project built using the Ruby on Rails platform. It is a web application where students can submit and peer-review learning objects (articles, code, web sites, etc). The source code is available at [https://github.com/expertiza/expertiza github]. | |||
= Overview of project = | |||
===Classes:=== | ===Classes:=== | ||
* analytic_controller.rb (163 lines) | * analytic_controller.rb (163 lines) | ||
Line 15: | Line 19: | ||
Display information about various system components in summary form, to aid in analysis. | Display information about various system components in summary form, to aid in analysis. | ||
===What | ===What was done:=== | ||
Analytic_controller.rb and course_analytic.rb had much duplicated code, which was be factored out. Additionally, analytic_controller.rb had methods that were too complicated, and were be separated into shorter, well-named methods, to make the operation of the class more transparent. Rest of the modules had duplicate code, which was refactored out. | |||
= Analysis = | |||
We used [https://codeclimate.com/github/expertiza/expertiza/code?q=analytic CodeClimate] to analyse the existing code. As can been be seen, there are several classes with duplicate code, high complexity and code smells.<br> | |||
[[File:code_clime_old.png]] | |||
*<b>High complexity</b> - AnalyticController, CourseAnalytic, QuestionnaireAnalytic | |||
*<b>Duplication</b> – AnalyticController, AssignmentAnalytic, AssignmentTeamAnalytic, CourseAnalytic, ResponseAnalytic | |||
*<b>Smells</b> - AnalyticController, AssignmentAnalytic, AssignmentTeamAnalytic, CourseAnalytic, ResponseAnalytic | |||
<br>As regards complexity, along with a high overall complexity, the classes also have a high complexity per method ratio | |||
=Design Changes= | |||
Due to a lot of duplication of code that occurred in the AssignmentAnalytic, AssignmentTeamAnalytic and CourseAnalytic module, there was a definite need to refactor the duplicate code and extract out the duplication by moving the common trends in the code to a common module named as CommonAnalytic. | |||
Here is the original design which has a lot of code duplication particularly in the modules AssignmentAnalytic, AssignmentTeamAnalytic and CourseAnalytic. | |||
[[File:Original_expertiza.jpg]] | |||
Thus the figure below gives the refactored design which removes the common and duplicate code from AssignmentAnalytic, AssignmentTeamAnalytic and CourseAnalytic module and moves them to a common module CommonAnalytic. | |||
[[File:New_refactor.jpg|center|refactored expertiza design for analytic]] | |||
In a similar way the modules ScoreAnalytic and QuestionAnalytic had redundant and duplicate code for getting word count, character count and unique character count. Thus again there was a need to refactor the duplicate code and extract out the duplication and move it a CountAnalytic module which would act as a center module thereby allowing ScoreAnalytic and QuestionAnalytic to delegate functions such as word count, character count and unique character count to the CountAnalytic module as shown below. | |||
[[File:Slide1.jpg|center|countQuestion]] | |||
=Code changes= | |||
==Refactoring in AnalyticController== | |||
=== Usage of inbuilt methods.=== | |||
<pre> | |||
def course_list | |||
courses = associated_courses(session[:user]) | |||
course_list = Array.new | |||
courses.each do |course| | |||
course_list << [course.name, course.id] | |||
end | |||
respond_to do |format| | |||
format.json { render :json => sort_by_name(course_list) } | |||
end | |||
end | |||
</pre> | |||
'''After refactoring''' | |||
<pre> | |||
def course_list | |||
courses = associated_courses(session[:user]) | |||
course_list = courses.map { |course| [course.name, course.id] } | |||
render :json => sort_by_name(course_list) | |||
end | |||
</pre> | |||
The above refactoring was applied to team_list and assignment_list as well. | |||
===Use of hashes=== | |||
<pre> | |||
case params[:type] | |||
when "line" | |||
chart_data = line_graph_data(params[:scope], params[:id], params[:data_type]) | |||
when "bar" | |||
chart_data = bar_chart_data(params[:scope], params[:id], params[:data_type]) | |||
when "scatter" | |||
chart_data = scatter_plot_data(params[:scope], params[:id], params[:data_type]) | |||
when "pie" | |||
chart_data = pie_chart_data(params[:scope], params[:id], params[:data_type]) | |||
end | |||
</pre> | |||
Hash was used to adhere to the DRY principle. | |||
<pre> | |||
graph_method_name = {'line' => 'line_graph_data', | |||
'bar' => 'bar_chart_data', | |||
'scatter' => 'scatter_plot_data', | |||
'pie' => 'pie_graph_data'} | |||
graph_data = send(graph_method_name[graph_type], scope, id, data_type) | |||
</pre> | |||
===Methods complexity=== | |||
Complex methods were broken down into smaller methods to enhance readability. | |||
== Refactoring in Modules == | |||
===Code movement=== | |||
The modules were initially placed in '''app/models/''' . They were moved to '''/lib/''' folder | |||
===Code Changes=== | |||
At many places the developers had added the logic to find, map, get unique object, etc. which already exist in Enumerable module. We changed the code to use these in-built methods. Some of the examples of such changes are: | |||
:1. <b>Code before refactor [self.questionnaire_unique? in assignment_analytic.rb]</b> | |||
<pre> | |||
def self.questionnaire_unique? | |||
self.all.each do |assignment| | |||
assignment.questionnaire_types.each do |questionnaire_type| | |||
questionnaire_list = Array.new | |||
assignment.questionnaires.each do |questionnaire| | |||
if questionnaire.type == questionnaire_type | |||
questionnaire_list << questionnaire | |||
end | |||
if questionnaire_list.count > 1 | |||
return false | |||
end | |||
end | |||
end | |||
end | |||
return true | |||
end | |||
</pre> | |||
:'''Code after refactoring.''' Here the inbuilt uniq method was used. If there are duplicates, then unique array length will be less than actual length. | |||
<pre> | |||
def self.questionnaire_unique? | |||
self.all.each do |assignment| | |||
questionnaires = assignment.questionnaires | |||
return false if questionnaires.uniq { |q| q.type }.length < questionnaires.length | |||
end | |||
return true | |||
end | |||
</pre> | |||
:2. <b>Code before refactoring [ questionnaire_of_type(type_name_in_string) in assignment_analytic.rb ]</b> | |||
<pre> | |||
def questionnaire_of_type(type_name_in_string) | |||
self.questionnaires.each do |questionnaire| | |||
if questionnaire.type == type_name_in_string | |||
return questionnaire | |||
end | |||
end | |||
end | |||
</pre> | |||
:'''Code after refactoring:''' The find method was used here. | |||
<pre> | |||
def questionnaire_of_type(type_name_in_string) | |||
self.questionnaires.find { |questionnaire| questionnaire == type_name_in_string } | |||
end | |||
</pre> | |||
:3 '''Code before refactoring [average_num_team_reviews in assignment_analytic ]'''. This pattern existed in many classes. | |||
<pre> | |||
def average_num_team_reviews | |||
if num_teams == 0 | |||
0 | |||
else | |||
total_num_team_reviews.to_f/num_teams | |||
end | |||
end | |||
</pre> | |||
:'''Code after refactoring:''' | |||
<pre> | |||
def average_num_team_reviews | |||
total_num_team_reviews.to_f/num_teams | |||
rescue ZeroDivisionError | |||
0 | |||
end | |||
</pre> | |||
The code consisted of several functions with unnecessary complexity. We refactored the code to reduce the complexity.<br/> | |||
The code consisted of several functions that had duplicate code. These methods transformed a list of objects into a list of one of the object’s attributes. This pattern was removed by creating a generic function. | |||
Following was one of the pattern that existed: | Following was one of the pattern that existed: | ||
Line 41: | Line 198: | ||
end | end | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
The refactored code for the above logic: | The refactored code for the above logic: | ||
Line 56: | Line 211: | ||
extract_from_list self.teams, :num_reviews | extract_from_list self.teams, :num_reviews | ||
(list.empty?) ? [0] : list | (list.empty?) ? [0] : list | ||
end | |||
</pre> | |||
The logic of the method was exactly what the <b>map</b> method does. Futher, a ternary if-else was used to enhance readability. | |||
The above pattern accounted for majority of the duplicate code. | |||
Code before refactoring [self.types in QuestionnaireAnalytic ] | |||
<pre> | |||
def self.types | |||
type_list = Array.new | |||
self.all.each do |questionnaire| | |||
if !type_list.include?(questionnaire.type) | |||
type_list << questionnaire.type | |||
end | |||
end | |||
type_list | |||
end | |||
</pre> | |||
Code after refactoring. | |||
<pre> | |||
def self.types | |||
type_list = extract_from_list self.all, :type | |||
type_list.uniq | |||
end | end | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
Line 89: | Line 268: | ||
##question_score_list | ##question_score_list | ||
##comments_text_list | ##comments_text_list | ||
= Post-refactoring report= | |||
[[File:code_clime_new.png]] | |||
Here is a summary of the results. | |||
[[File:Report.png]] | |||
=Future work= | |||
#Currently only bar charts can be seen. Further work can be done to get different kinds of graphs such as pie chart, scatter plot, etc. | |||
#There are some requests that take a long time to respond. For example, View Scores Request. They can be optimized to reduce the response time. | |||
=External Links= | |||
#http://guides.rubyonrails.org/ A guide for Ruby on Rails | |||
#http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WhatIsRefactoring What is Refactoring? | |||
#https://codeclimate.com/ Automated Code Review | |||
#https://github.com/expertiza/expertiza | |||
#https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide Ruby Style Guide |
Latest revision as of 03:00, 31 October 2013
E818 Refactoring and testing -- analytics
This Wiki page provides a detailed description of the Open Source Software project conducted on Expertiza, as part of the Object Oriented Languages and Systems coursework.
Introduction to Expertiza
Expertiza is an open source project built using the Ruby on Rails platform. It is a web application where students can submit and peer-review learning objects (articles, code, web sites, etc). The source code is available at github.
Overview of project
Classes:
- analytic_controller.rb (163 lines)
- assignment_analytic.rb (206 lines)
- assignment_team_analytic.rb (126 lines)
- course_analytic.rb (142 lines)
- question_analytic.rb (12 lines)
- questionnaire_analytic.rb (55 lines)
- response_analytic.rb (101 lines)
- score_analytic.rb (12 lines)
What they do:
Display information about various system components in summary form, to aid in analysis.
What was done:
Analytic_controller.rb and course_analytic.rb had much duplicated code, which was be factored out. Additionally, analytic_controller.rb had methods that were too complicated, and were be separated into shorter, well-named methods, to make the operation of the class more transparent. Rest of the modules had duplicate code, which was refactored out.
Analysis
We used CodeClimate to analyse the existing code. As can been be seen, there are several classes with duplicate code, high complexity and code smells.
- High complexity - AnalyticController, CourseAnalytic, QuestionnaireAnalytic
- Duplication – AnalyticController, AssignmentAnalytic, AssignmentTeamAnalytic, CourseAnalytic, ResponseAnalytic
- Smells - AnalyticController, AssignmentAnalytic, AssignmentTeamAnalytic, CourseAnalytic, ResponseAnalytic
As regards complexity, along with a high overall complexity, the classes also have a high complexity per method ratio
Design Changes
Due to a lot of duplication of code that occurred in the AssignmentAnalytic, AssignmentTeamAnalytic and CourseAnalytic module, there was a definite need to refactor the duplicate code and extract out the duplication by moving the common trends in the code to a common module named as CommonAnalytic.
Here is the original design which has a lot of code duplication particularly in the modules AssignmentAnalytic, AssignmentTeamAnalytic and CourseAnalytic.
Thus the figure below gives the refactored design which removes the common and duplicate code from AssignmentAnalytic, AssignmentTeamAnalytic and CourseAnalytic module and moves them to a common module CommonAnalytic.
In a similar way the modules ScoreAnalytic and QuestionAnalytic had redundant and duplicate code for getting word count, character count and unique character count. Thus again there was a need to refactor the duplicate code and extract out the duplication and move it a CountAnalytic module which would act as a center module thereby allowing ScoreAnalytic and QuestionAnalytic to delegate functions such as word count, character count and unique character count to the CountAnalytic module as shown below.
Code changes
Refactoring in AnalyticController
Usage of inbuilt methods.
def course_list courses = associated_courses(session[:user]) course_list = Array.new courses.each do |course| course_list << [course.name, course.id] end respond_to do |format| format.json { render :json => sort_by_name(course_list) } end end
After refactoring
def course_list courses = associated_courses(session[:user]) course_list = courses.map { |course| [course.name, course.id] } render :json => sort_by_name(course_list) end
The above refactoring was applied to team_list and assignment_list as well.
Use of hashes
case params[:type] when "line" chart_data = line_graph_data(params[:scope], params[:id], params[:data_type]) when "bar" chart_data = bar_chart_data(params[:scope], params[:id], params[:data_type]) when "scatter" chart_data = scatter_plot_data(params[:scope], params[:id], params[:data_type]) when "pie" chart_data = pie_chart_data(params[:scope], params[:id], params[:data_type]) end
Hash was used to adhere to the DRY principle.
graph_method_name = {'line' => 'line_graph_data', 'bar' => 'bar_chart_data', 'scatter' => 'scatter_plot_data', 'pie' => 'pie_graph_data'} graph_data = send(graph_method_name[graph_type], scope, id, data_type)
Methods complexity
Complex methods were broken down into smaller methods to enhance readability.
Refactoring in Modules
Code movement
The modules were initially placed in app/models/ . They were moved to /lib/ folder
Code Changes
At many places the developers had added the logic to find, map, get unique object, etc. which already exist in Enumerable module. We changed the code to use these in-built methods. Some of the examples of such changes are:
- 1. Code before refactor [self.questionnaire_unique? in assignment_analytic.rb]
def self.questionnaire_unique? self.all.each do |assignment| assignment.questionnaire_types.each do |questionnaire_type| questionnaire_list = Array.new assignment.questionnaires.each do |questionnaire| if questionnaire.type == questionnaire_type questionnaire_list << questionnaire end if questionnaire_list.count > 1 return false end end end end return true end
- Code after refactoring. Here the inbuilt uniq method was used. If there are duplicates, then unique array length will be less than actual length.
def self.questionnaire_unique? self.all.each do |assignment| questionnaires = assignment.questionnaires return false if questionnaires.uniq { |q| q.type }.length < questionnaires.length end return true end
- 2. Code before refactoring [ questionnaire_of_type(type_name_in_string) in assignment_analytic.rb ]
def questionnaire_of_type(type_name_in_string) self.questionnaires.each do |questionnaire| if questionnaire.type == type_name_in_string return questionnaire end end end
- Code after refactoring: The find method was used here.
def questionnaire_of_type(type_name_in_string) self.questionnaires.find { |questionnaire| questionnaire == type_name_in_string } end
- 3 Code before refactoring [average_num_team_reviews in assignment_analytic ]. This pattern existed in many classes.
def average_num_team_reviews if num_teams == 0 0 else total_num_team_reviews.to_f/num_teams end end
- Code after refactoring:
def average_num_team_reviews total_num_team_reviews.to_f/num_teams rescue ZeroDivisionError 0 end
The code consisted of several functions with unnecessary complexity. We refactored the code to reduce the complexity.
The code consisted of several functions that had duplicate code. These methods transformed a list of objects into a list of one of the object’s attributes. This pattern was removed by creating a generic function.
Following was one of the pattern that existed:
# Expertiza code before refactoring in assignment_analytic.rb def team_review_counts list = Array.new self.teams.each do |team| list << team.num_reviews end if (list.empty?) [0] else list end end
The refactored code for the above logic:
# Helper function moved to common_analytic.rb def extract_from_list(list, property) list.map { |item| item.send(property) } end # Method in assignment_analytic.rb def team_review_counts extract_from_list self.teams, :num_reviews (list.empty?) ? [0] : list end
The logic of the method was exactly what the map method does. Futher, a ternary if-else was used to enhance readability.
The above pattern accounted for majority of the duplicate code. Code before refactoring [self.types in QuestionnaireAnalytic ]
def self.types type_list = Array.new self.all.each do |questionnaire| if !type_list.include?(questionnaire.type) type_list << questionnaire.type end end type_list end
Code after refactoring.
def self.types type_list = extract_from_list self.all, :type type_list.uniq end
The following is a list of methods and classes changed for refactoring:
- assignment_analytic.rb
- self.questionnaire_unique?
- questionnaire_of_type
- team_review_counts
- team_scores
- course_analytic.rb
- average_num_assignment_teams
- average_assignment_score
- assignment_review_counts
- assignment_team_counts
- assignment_average_scores
- assignment_max_scores
- assignment_min_scores
- assignment_team_analytic.rb
- average_review_word_count
- average_review_score
- average_review_character_count
- review_character_counts
- review_scores
- review_word_counts
- questionnaire_analytic.rb
- questions_text_list
- word_count_list
- character_count_list
- response_analytic.rb
- word_count_list
- character_count_list
- question_score_list
- comments_text_list
Post-refactoring report
Here is a summary of the results.
Future work
- Currently only bar charts can be seen. Further work can be done to get different kinds of graphs such as pie chart, scatter plot, etc.
- There are some requests that take a long time to respond. For example, View Scores Request. They can be optimized to reduce the response time.
External Links
- http://guides.rubyonrails.org/ A guide for Ruby on Rails
- http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WhatIsRefactoring What is Refactoring?
- https://codeclimate.com/ Automated Code Review
- https://github.com/expertiza/expertiza
- https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide Ruby Style Guide