CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2007/wiki1 4 ar: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<i> | <i> | ||
Ruby's private methods can be called only on "self" (the calling object). They can't be applied to other objects of the same class, even from within the class definition. In class today, I opined that it is rarely if ever necessary to call a private method on another object of the same class. Try to find Java or C++ examples on the Web where a private method is called on another object. Decide if this is good design, or if it would be better performed by using accessor functions, from the standpoint of elegance or maintainability. If you cannot find any such examples (or even if you can), try to find arguments about why one should not invoke private methods on other objects. Analyze these arguments; can you find weaknesses? | Ruby's private methods can be called only on "self" (the calling object). They can't be applied to other objects of the same class, even from within the class definition. In class today, I opined that it is rarely if ever necessary to call a private method on another object of the same class. Try to find Java or C++ examples on the Web where a private method is called on another object. Decide if this is good design, or if it would be better performed by using accessor functions, from the standpoint of elegance or maintainability. If you cannot find any such examples (or even if you can), try to find arguments about why one should not invoke private methods on other objects. Analyze these arguments; can you find weaknesses? | ||
</i> | </i> | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
foo | foo | ||
end | end | ||
end | |||
Output : | Output : | ||
irb(main):170:0> Base.new.test | irb(main):170:0> Base.new.test | ||
foo | foo | ||
irb(main):171:0> Base.new. | irb(main):171:0> Base.new.foo | ||
NoMethodError: private method `foo' called for #<Base:0x695e9d4> | NoMethodError: private method `foo' called for #<Base:0x695e9d4> | ||
Example -1 shows that private methods can be called only with an implicit receiver. | Example -1 shows that private methods can be called only with an implicit receiver. Calling a private method using an explicit receiver throws NoMethodError. <i>Base.new.foo</i> is the explicit receiver which is trying to call the private method, hence throwing NoMethodError.<br> | ||
Private methods cannot be invoked using an explicit receiver. But we use "self" to invoke writer methods else the method will be interpreted as an assignment to a local variable.<br> | Private methods cannot be invoked using an explicit receiver. But we use "self" to invoke writer methods else the method will be interpreted as an assignment to a local variable.<br> | ||
Line 61: | Line 58: | ||
}; | }; | ||
Example -2 shows that a private method can be called by any instance of the same class. | Example -2 shows that a private method can be called by any instance of the same class. <i>otherObject</i> is the instance of the same class <i>Base</i>, which calls the private method foo successfully. | ||
Example -3: | Example -3: | ||
class Base | class Base | ||
private | |||
def foo | |||
puts "foo" | |||
end | |||
public | |||
def test | |||
foo | |||
self.foo | |||
end | |||
end | end | ||
b = Base.new | |||
b.test | |||
Example -3 shows that when calling a private method a receiver cannot be specified in Ruby.<br> | Output: | ||
foo | |||
NoMethodError: private method `foo' called for #<Base:0x4ef2690> | |||
Example -3 shows that when calling a private method a receiver cannot be specified in Ruby. Even calling the private method <i>foo</i> through <i>self</i> throws NoMethodError.<br> | |||
So it can be concluded that in C++, “private” defines “private to the class”, while in Ruby it means “private to this instance”. | So it can be concluded that in C++, “private” defines “private to the class”, while in Ruby it means “private to this instance”. | ||
Line 99: | Line 104: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Since private methods have a loophole in security, an alternative good practice would be to use accessor functions. In accessor functions, we implement the getter and setter methods for the private attributes, thereby providing the required security.<br> | Since private methods have a loophole in security, an alternative good practice would be to use accessor functions. In accessor functions, we implement the getter and setter methods for the private attributes, thereby providing the required security.<br> | ||
There are three accessor functions in Ruby – <br> | |||
<i>attr_reader </i>– creates a getter method.<br> | |||
<i>attr_writer </i>– creates a setter method.<br> | |||
<i>attr_accessor </i>– creates getter and setter methods.<br> | |||
Example -5: | |||
class Vehicle | |||
attr_reader :model | |||
attr_writer :color | |||
attr_accessor :price | |||
def initialize(model,color,price) | |||
@model = model | |||
@color = color | |||
@price = price | |||
end | |||
end | |||
v = Vehicle.new("Camry","black",20000) | |||
puts v.model | |||
puts v.color #throws NoMethodError | |||
puts v.price | |||
v.price = 30000 | |||
puts v.price | |||
Output: | |||
Camry | |||
NoMethodError: undefined method `color' for #<Vehicle:0x66604d0 @model="Camry", @price=40000, @color="black"> | |||
20000 | |||
30000 | |||
Example -5 shows the implementation of the accessor functions. The <i>model</i> attribute has only a getter method, hence we cannot set a value to it. The <i>color</i> attribute has only a setter method, hence we cannot read value from it. But <i>price</i> has both getter and setter methods, hence we can read and write value to it.<br> | |||
The advantages of using accessor functions are – <i>Flexibility </i> and <i> Maintainability</i> | The advantages of using accessor functions are – <i>Flexibility </i> and <i> Maintainability</i> | ||
Line 106: | Line 144: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
In general, it is a good programming practice to use accessor functions instead of invoking private methods in Ruby. | In general, it is a good programming practice to use accessor functions instead of invoking private methods in Ruby.<br> | ||
<h3>References</h3><br> | |||
1. Programming Ruby: The Pragmatic Programmers' Guide<br> | |||
2. http://www.rubycentral.com/pickaxe/win32.html<br> | |||
3. http://lylejohnson.name/blog/?p=5<br> | |||
4. http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/120257#new<br> |
Latest revision as of 01:35, 20 September 2007
Private Method Invocation in Ruby
Ruby's private methods can be called only on "self" (the calling object). They can't be applied to other objects of the same class, even from within the class definition. In class today, I opined that it is rarely if ever necessary to call a private method on another object of the same class. Try to find Java or C++ examples on the Web where a private method is called on another object. Decide if this is good design, or if it would be better performed by using accessor functions, from the standpoint of elegance or maintainability. If you cannot find any such examples (or even if you can), try to find arguments about why one should not invoke private methods on other objects. Analyze these arguments; can you find weaknesses?
Ruby’s Access Control Mechanisms
Ruby has three levels of access controls – Public, Protected and Private.
Public methods – can be accessed by anyone. In Ruby, public is default access control, except for initialize method which is private by default.
Protected methods – can be accessed only by the defining class and its subclasses. Access is kept within the family.
Private methods – can be accessed only by the objects of the defining class. The explicit receiver is always self (the current object), which means that it is impossible to invoke another object’s private methods and variables directly even if the object has the same class type as the caller.
Example -1:
class Base private def foo puts "foo" end public def test foo end end
Output : irb(main):170:0> Base.new.test foo irb(main):171:0> Base.new.foo NoMethodError: private method `foo' called for #<Base:0x695e9d4>
Example -1 shows that private methods can be called only with an implicit receiver. Calling a private method using an explicit receiver throws NoMethodError. Base.new.foo is the explicit receiver which is trying to call the private method, hence throwing NoMethodError.
Private methods cannot be invoked using an explicit receiver. But we use "self" to invoke writer methods else the method will be interpreted as an assignment to a local variable.
Comparing the private method invocation in C++ and Ruby
The private methods in C++ can be invoked by another object of the same class whereas Ruby does not allow explicit receiver for private methods.
Example -2:
class Base { private: void foo(); public: void spam(Base *otherObject) { foo(); // this is allowed otherObject->foo(); // and so is this } };
Example -2 shows that a private method can be called by any instance of the same class. otherObject is the instance of the same class Base, which calls the private method foo successfully.
Example -3:
class Base private def foo puts "foo" end public def test foo self.foo end end b = Base.new b.test
Output: foo NoMethodError: private method `foo' called for #<Base:0x4ef2690>
Example -3 shows that when calling a private method a receiver cannot be specified in Ruby. Even calling the private method foo through self throws NoMethodError.
So it can be concluded that in C++, “private” defines “private to the class”, while in Ruby it means “private to this instance”.
Bypassing private method invocation in Ruby
Example -4:
class Test private def print_hello puts "Hello everyone!" end end t = Test.new t.send( "print_hello" )
Output: Hello everyone!
Example -4 shows that it is possible to access private methods in Ruby through “send” function. In Ruby, declaring as private is only a guideline and not a strict rule. There are workarounds to access those private methods. The advantage of such workarounds allows testing of private methods but it is a bad practice since private methods are internals of a class.
Since private methods have a loophole in security, an alternative good practice would be to use accessor functions. In accessor functions, we implement the getter and setter methods for the private attributes, thereby providing the required security.
There are three accessor functions in Ruby –
attr_reader – creates a getter method.
attr_writer – creates a setter method.
attr_accessor – creates getter and setter methods.
Example -5:
class Vehicle attr_reader :model attr_writer :color attr_accessor :price def initialize(model,color,price) @model = model @color = color @price = price end end v = Vehicle.new("Camry","black",20000) puts v.model puts v.color #throws NoMethodError puts v.price v.price = 30000 puts v.price
Output: Camry NoMethodError: undefined method `color' for #<Vehicle:0x66604d0 @model="Camry", @price=40000, @color="black"> 20000 30000
Example -5 shows the implementation of the accessor functions. The model attribute has only a getter method, hence we cannot set a value to it. The color attribute has only a setter method, hence we cannot read value from it. But price has both getter and setter methods, hence we can read and write value to it.
The advantages of using accessor functions are – Flexibility and Maintainability
In general, it is a good programming practice to use accessor functions instead of invoking private methods in Ruby.
References
1. Programming Ruby: The Pragmatic Programmers' Guide
2. http://www.rubycentral.com/pickaxe/win32.html
3. http://lylejohnson.name/blog/?p=5
4. http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/120257#new