Talk:CSC 379:Weed 1, Group 2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Using a Contents page is good, but ideally, there would be more than one top-level heading. Dividing the strategies into categories would also help the readers to remember them. | Using a Contents page is good, but ideally, there would be more than one top-level heading. Dividing the strategies into categories would also help the readers to remember them. | ||
After that, the content becomes sparser, and should be fleshed out. | |||
The idea of corruption of escrow agencies needs to be explained. | |||
Latest revision as of 20:41, 12 July 2007
Listing articles is good. Please also list the source ... and the date, if possible.
The analysis of paid e-mail could be worded better. The analysis of opt-in vs. opt-out is good, and well phrased.
Using a Contents page is good, but ideally, there would be more than one top-level heading. Dividing the strategies into categories would also help the readers to remember them.
After that, the content becomes sparser, and should be fleshed out.
The idea of corruption of escrow agencies needs to be explained.