CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Introduction==
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project Juniper:Bookmark Enhancements]]
===Expertiza Background===
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1803: Introducing a Student View for Instructors]]
 
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1804: OSS project Yellow: Topic management]]
Best stated in the project documentation, “The Expertiza project is software to create reusable learning objects through peer review. It also supports team projects, and the submission of almost any document type, including URLs and wiki pages.” The system makes it easy for instructors to post assignments and manage students. Students are able to work in teams, submit assignments, review feedback, and review their teammates.
* [[CSC/ECE_517_Spring_2018- Project E1805: Convolutional data extraction from Github]]
 
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1808: Refactor review_mapping_controller.rb]]
===Description of Current Project===
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1810: Show sample submissions and reviews]]
 
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018/E1814 Write unit tests for collusion cycle.rb]]
Basic functionality already exists to add bookmarks to topics. Users can submit links via a bookmark to provide helpful sources for the author to complete their work. Authors can rank the usefulness of these bookmarks as 1-5 with a drop down menu next to the bookmark.
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project M1802: 2D Canvas Rendering]]
 
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project M1802: 2D Canvas Rendering (Part 2)]]
This project intends to build on the bookmark functionality by allowing instructors to access the bookmark ratings rubric, and designing a way to assess if these bookmarks are being utilized by the author.
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018 - E1800: Add past-due assignments to task list]]
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1812: on the fly calc.rb]]
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project M1803: Implement a web page fuzzer to find rendering mismatches ]]
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project M1803: Implement a web page fuzzer to find rendering mismatches (Part 2)]]
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018/E1813 Test Menu Items Model]]
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1816: Visualization for Instructors]]
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1817: Adding Student-generated Questions to Rubric]]
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1818:  Role-based reviewing]]
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1822: Extend the functionality of badging]]
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1815: Improvements to review grader]]
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1824: Let course staff as well as students do reviews]]
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1819: Improve self review, link self and peer review to derive grades]]
* [[CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1820 Review-Comment Tone Analysis Report]]


==Issues==
==Issues==


===Problem 1:===  
====Problem 1:====  
When an instructor is logged in, they can manage rubrics under the Manage > Questionnaires tab. However, bookmark ratings are not available to be selected.
When an instructor is logged in, they can manage rubrics under the Manage > Questionnaires tab. However, bookmark ratings are not available to be selected.


[[File:Problem1.jpg|thumb|center|100px|Manage Menu]]
[[File:Problem1.jpg|frame|center|100px|Manage Menu]]


===Enhancements to the problem:===
====Enhancements to the problem:====
An instructor can now see ‘Bookmark reviews’ in the Manage > Questionnaires drop down menu.
An instructor can now see ‘Bookmark reviews’ in the Manage > Questionnaires drop down menu.
====Problem 2====
The current functionality only allows for the author to review the bookmark, and the reviewer is not able to assess the usefulness of a bookmark.
====Enhancements to the problem:====
The design below could be implemented to allow for input from reviewers on bookmarks. This would involve modification to the existing classes to add “karma points,” which are points a

Latest revision as of 17:35, 6 June 2018

Issues

Problem 1:

When an instructor is logged in, they can manage rubrics under the Manage > Questionnaires tab. However, bookmark ratings are not available to be selected.

Manage Menu

Enhancements to the problem:

An instructor can now see ‘Bookmark reviews’ in the Manage > Questionnaires drop down menu.

Problem 2

The current functionality only allows for the author to review the bookmark, and the reviewer is not able to assess the usefulness of a bookmark.

Enhancements to the problem:

The design below could be implemented to allow for input from reviewers on bookmarks. This would involve modification to the existing classes to add “karma points,” which are points a

Retrieved from "https://wiki.expertiza.ncsu.edu/index.php?title=CSC/ECE_517_Spring_2018&oldid=117515"