https://wiki.expertiza.ncsu.edu/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=CSC%2FECE_517_Fall_2009%2Fwiki2_design_pattern_static_dynamicCSC/ECE 517 Fall 2009/wiki2 design pattern static dynamic - Revision history2026-05-25T22:14:36ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.41.0https://wiki.expertiza.ncsu.edu/index.php?title=CSC/ECE_517_Fall_2009/wiki2_design_pattern_static_dynamic&diff=23037&oldid=prevKanke: Design Patterns from a Static/Dynamic Point of View2009-10-08T19:12:38Z<p>Design Patterns from a Static/Dynamic Point of View</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>'''Design Patterns from a Static/Dynamic Point of View'''<br />
<br />
Clearly, Ruby offers more concise realizations of certain design patterns than Java does. Is this typical of dynamic o-o languages? Are there design patterns that any dynamically typed language can realize better than a statically typed language? Are there instances when a <em>different</em> pattern should be used in a dynamic language than a static language?<br />
<br />
== Introduction ==<br />
=== Design Pattern ===<br />
=== Static/Dynamic Type Language ===<br />
== Example ==<br />
== Conclusion ==</div>Kanke