CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1824: Let course staff as well as students do reviews: Difference between revisions
m (→Test Plan) |
m (→Test Plan) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Many of our changes would be reflected on views (user interface). Following is the list of tests that should be conducted with rspec/capybara: | Many of our changes would be reflected on views (user interface). Following is the list of tests that should be conducted with rspec/capybara: | ||
# it "should see the Perform Review link (beside Assign Grade link) for each submission after a list of submissions are pulled up by an instructor" | # it "should see the Perform Review link (beside Assign Grade link) for each submission after a list of submissions are pulled up by an instructor if the final due date for the assignment has passed" | ||
# it "should see the Perform Review link only for each submission after a list of submissions are pulled up by an instructor if the final due date for the assignment has not passed" | |||
# it "should pull up a review page for the submission of the team after the Perform Review link is clicked on by an instructor" | # it "should pull up a review page for the submission of the team after the Perform Review link is clicked on by an instructor" | ||
# it "should show highlighted reviews done by instructors when a student views feedback on his/her submission" | # it "should show highlighted reviews done by instructors when a student views feedback on his/her submission" | ||
Revision as of 22:11, 8 April 2018
Introduction
The way Expertiza is set up right now is that only peers can review your work. However, there are cases when the instructor would want to submit reviews as well. This project aims to implement this feature.
Problem Statement
Peer review is a great way for students to learn about how well they have developed their application. However there are some problems with this:
- Sometimes, the peer reviews may not be thorough and the team/person's work reviewed might not reflect the actual status of the development.
- The reviewer might not know how well they are reviewing the peer's work. They might not entirely know as to what tone to use or what suggestions to put forward.
Currently this is how a typical review table looks like:
By letting course staff perform reviews as well, the reviewer and the reviewee are both benefited, which can improve the overall learning experience.
Proposed Solutions
Test Plan
Many of our changes would be reflected on views (user interface). Following is the list of tests that should be conducted with rspec/capybara:
- it "should see the Perform Review link (beside Assign Grade link) for each submission after a list of submissions are pulled up by an instructor if the final due date for the assignment has passed"
- it "should see the Perform Review link only for each submission after a list of submissions are pulled up by an instructor if the final due date for the assignment has not passed"
- it "should pull up a review page for the submission of the team after the Perform Review link is clicked on by an instructor"
- it "should show highlighted reviews done by instructors when a student views feedback on his/her submission"
- it "should pull up a calibration report when a student wants to see the difference between his/her reviews on other's submission and the instructor's"
Team Members
- Ashis Sahoo
- Satvik Shetty
- Xiaohui Ellis
- Kushal Nawalakha
References
Expertiza
Expertiza Github
Expertiza Documentation