CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1824: Let course staff as well as students do reviews: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
(Initial Draft)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Introduction ==
== '''Introduction''' ==
== Objectives of the Project ==
 
== Implementation Plan ==
The way Expertiza is set up right now is that only peers can review your work. However, there are cases when the instructor would want to submit reviews as well. This project aims to implement this feature.
== Test Plan ==
 
== Desired Results ==
== '''Problem Statement''' ==
== References ==
 
== Team Members ==
Peer review is a great way for students to learn about how well they have developed their application. However there are some problems with this:
* Sometimes, the peer reviews may not be thorough and the team/person's work reviewed might not reflect the actual status of the development.
* The reviewer might not know how well they are reviewing the peer's work. They might not entirely know as to what tone to use or what suggestions to put forward.
 
 
By letting course staff perform reviews as well, the reviewer and the reviewee are both benefited, which can improve the overall learning experience.
 
== '''Proposed Solutions''' ==
 
 
 
== '''Test Plan''' ==
 
 
== '''Team Members''' ==
*Ashis Sahoo
*Ashis Sahoo
*Satvik Shetty
*Satvik Shetty
*Xiaohui Ellis
*Xiaohui Ellis
*Kushal Nawalakha
*Kushal Nawalakha
== '''References''' ==
Expertiza
* https://expertiza.ncsu.edu/
Expertiza Github
* https://github.com/expertiza/expertiza
Expertiza Documentation
* http://wiki.expertiza.ncsu.edu/index.php/Expertiza_documentation

Revision as of 21:04, 8 April 2018

Introduction

The way Expertiza is set up right now is that only peers can review your work. However, there are cases when the instructor would want to submit reviews as well. This project aims to implement this feature.

Problem Statement

Peer review is a great way for students to learn about how well they have developed their application. However there are some problems with this:

  • Sometimes, the peer reviews may not be thorough and the team/person's work reviewed might not reflect the actual status of the development.
  • The reviewer might not know how well they are reviewing the peer's work. They might not entirely know as to what tone to use or what suggestions to put forward.


By letting course staff perform reviews as well, the reviewer and the reviewee are both benefited, which can improve the overall learning experience.

Proposed Solutions

Test Plan

Team Members

  • Ashis Sahoo
  • Satvik Shetty
  • Xiaohui Ellis
  • Kushal Nawalakha

References

Expertiza

Expertiza Github

Expertiza Documentation