CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2018- Project E1815: Improvements to review grader: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:


===Issue 3===
===Issue 3===
=='''Adding color schemes to identify update to reviews as per submissions'''==
Currently, in review report, each team reviewed is color coded as, red indicating that the review is not yet completed and blue indicating that the review grade is not assigned or updated. So if an instructor sees a name in red, the student should not be given credit for the review.  If text is in blue, then the student has not been graded for the review, so the instructor should grade it now. But there is caveat here. If the reviewer has reviewed the work but the author did not resubmit, the reviewer has nothing new to review in the latest round and should not be downgraded for not re-reviewing the work. These reviews should be coded in another color, perhaps green.


== '''UML Diagram''' ==
== '''UML Diagram''' ==

Revision as of 16:23, 8 April 2018

Introduction

This project aims to enhance the review report and summary page, and display more information necessary for grading. The goal is to help the instructors by making the process of grading reviews easier and more accurate.

Problem Statement

Issue 1: Visualization of Metrics in Review Reports

In the current review report page, the metrics are displayed as plain text. Showing a bar chart for the metric rather than just text would make grading easier. Also, if several metrics are shown in the column, showing multiple lines of text for each metric can make the column cluttered and difficult to read.

Issue 2

Issue 3

Adding color schemes to identify update to reviews as per submissions

Currently, in review report, each team reviewed is color coded as, red indicating that the review is not yet completed and blue indicating that the review grade is not assigned or updated. So if an instructor sees a name in red, the student should not be given credit for the review. If text is in blue, then the student has not been graded for the review, so the instructor should grade it now. But there is caveat here. If the reviewer has reviewed the work but the author did not resubmit, the reviewer has nothing new to review in the latest round and should not be downgraded for not re-reviewing the work. These reviews should be coded in another color, perhaps green.

UML Diagram

Proposed Solutions

Issue 1

Issue 2

Issue 3

Test Plan

References