CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2017/E17A1: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "This wiki page is the description of the E17A1 semester project - Let experts as well as students do reviews - for Fall 2017, CSC/ECE 517. = Introduction = === Expertiza === Ex...")
 
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


= Action Items =
= Action Items =
=== Existing Limitations ===
At present the calibration functionality is limited, the following points present the scenarios where the current implementation is lacking:
# No support for varying rubric by round feature.
# From the perspective of the student, lack of differentiation of review - whether its from an expert or otherwise.
# A student is not notified once an expert submits a review.
# Additionally, a student should be able to see how an expert rated his/her assignment - similar to how it's done in calibration results for calibrated assignments(''As seen when '''Show Calibration Results''' is clicked.'').


= Design Overview =
= Design Overview =
For the purpose of this project, experts in the expertiza domain are Teaching Assistants(TAs) and Instructors.


= Affected Codebase =
= Affected Codebase =


= Test Plan =
= Test Plan =

Revision as of 23:25, 6 November 2017

This wiki page is the description of the E17A1 semester project - Let experts as well as students do reviews - for Fall 2017, CSC/ECE 517.

Introduction

Expertiza

Expertiza is an open source project based on Ruby on Rails framework. Expertiza allows the instructor to create new assignments and customize new or existing assignments. It also allows the instructor to create a list of topics the students can sign up for. Students can form teams in Expertiza to work on various projects and assignments. Students can also peer review other students' submissions. Expertiza supports submission across various document types, including the URLs and wiki pages.

Environment Setup

Action Items

Existing Limitations

At present the calibration functionality is limited, the following points present the scenarios where the current implementation is lacking:

  1. No support for varying rubric by round feature.
  2. From the perspective of the student, lack of differentiation of review - whether its from an expert or otherwise.
  3. A student is not notified once an expert submits a review.
  4. Additionally, a student should be able to see how an expert rated his/her assignment - similar to how it's done in calibration results for calibrated assignments(As seen when Show Calibration Results is clicked.).


Design Overview

For the purpose of this project, experts in the expertiza domain are Teaching Assistants(TAs) and Instructors.

Affected Codebase

Test Plan