CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2015/oss E1566 ARB: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 245: Line 245:
=== UI Testing ===
=== UI Testing ===


Following steps needs to be performed to test this code from UI:
Following steps needs to be performed to test this code from UI:<br/>
1. Login as instructor. Create a course and an assignment under that course.
1. Login as instructor. Create a course and an assignment under that course.<br/>
2. Keep the has team checkbox checked while creating the assignment. Add a grading rubric to it. Add at least two students as participants to the assignment.
2. Keep the has team checkbox checked while creating the assignment. Add a grading rubric to it. Add at least two students as participants to the assignment.<br/>
3. Create topics for the assignment
3. Create topics for the assignment.<br/>
4. Sign in as one of the students who were added to the assignment.  
4. Sign in as one of the students who were added to the assignment.<br/>
5. Go to the assignment and sign up for a topic.
5. Go to the assignment and sign up for a topic.<br/>
6. Submit student's work by clicking 'Your work' under that assignment.
6. Submit student's work by clicking 'Your work' under that assignment.<br/>
7. Sign in as a different student which is participant of the assignment.
7. Sign in as a different student which is participant of the assignment.<br/>
8. Go to Assignments--><assignment name>-->Others' work (If the link is disabled, login as instructor and change the due date of the assignment to current time).
8. Go to Assignments--><assignment name>-->Others' work (If the link is disabled, login as instructor and change the due date of the assignment to current time).<br/>
9. Give reviews on first student's work.
9. Give reviews on first student's work.<br/>
10. Login as instructor or first student to look at the review grades.
10. Login as instructor or first student to look at the review grades.<br/>

Revision as of 04:33, 7 November 2015

This wiki page is for the description of changes made under E1555 OSS assignment for Fall 2015, CSC/ECE 517.

Peer Review Information

For users intending to view the deployed Expertiza associated with this assignment, the credentials are below:

  • Instructor login: username -> instructor6, password -> password
  • Student login: username -> student4340, password -> password
  • Student login: username -> student4405, password -> password

Expertiza Background

Expertiza is an educational web application created and maintained by the joint efforts of the students and the faculty at NCSU. It’s an open source project developed on Ruby on Rails platform and it’s code is available on Github. It allows students to review each other’s work and improve their work upon this feedback.

Description of the current project

The following is an Expertiza based OSS project which deals primarily with the GradesController and GradesHelper. It focusses on refactoring some of the more complex methods, modifying some of the language to make it more Ruby friendly, removing some redundant code. The goal of this project is to attempt to make this part of the application easier to read and maintain.

Files modified in current project

A controller and a helper file were modified for this project namely: 1.GradesController 2.GradesHelper

GradesController

This is a controller that helps students and instructors view grades and reviews, update scores, check for grading conflicts and calculate penalties. A couple of long and complex methods were refactored from this controller along with removal of some non-functional code and a few language changes to make it Ruby style. Three methods in particular, namely conflict_notification ,calculate_all_penalties and edit were found to be too long and were in need of refactoring into smaller, easier to manage methods. Few more compact methods were created for this purpose.

There were no existing test cases for the controller. We have added a spec file named 'grades_spec.rb' under the spec folder. As no changes were done for the model, no tests for the model were included.

GradesHelper

This is a helper class which contains methods for constructing a table(construct_table) and to check whether an assignment has a team and metareveiw(has_team_and_metareview)

List of changes

We worked on the following work items WI1 : Refactor calculate_all_penalties method into smaller methods WI2 : Move the repeated code in conflict_notification & edit methods to a separate method list_questions. WI3 : Refactor the code as per the Ruby style guidelines and incorporate the good practices WI4 : Test the conflict_notification method to test the changes made.

Solutions Implemented and Delivered

  • WI1 : Refactoring calculate_all_penalties method

This is used to calculate various penalty values for each assignment if penalty is applicable. This method was very complex, performing too many functions within a single method and had to be broken into 3 smaller methods each having a more well defined function. This was split into the following three methods:
i. calculate_all_penalties
ii. calculate_penatly_attributes
iii. assign_all_penalties
Changes were also made to make the code follow ruby style. Finally some redundant code was commented out as it was non-functional.


Refactoring into smaller more specific methods:

Before :

   def calculate_all_penalties(assignment_id)
   .
   .
   .                 
       if calculate_for_participants == true
         penalty_attr1 = {:deadline_type_id => 1,:participant_id => @participant.id, :penalty_points => penalties[:submission]}
         CalculatedPenalty.create(penalty_attr1)
         penalty_attr2 = {:deadline_type_id => 2,:participant_id => @participant.id, :penalty_points => penalties[:review]}
         CalculatedPenalty.create(penalty_attr2)
         penalty_attr3 = {:deadline_type_id => 5,:participant_id => @participant.id, :penalty_points => penalties[:meta_review]}
         CalculatedPenalty.create(penalty_attr3)
       end
     end
     @all_penalties[participant.id] = {}
     @all_penalties[participant.id][:submission] = penalties[:submission]
     @all_penalties[participant.id][:review] = penalties[:review]
     @all_penalties[participant.id][:meta_review] = penalties[:meta_review]
     @all_penalties[participant.id][:total_penalty] = @total_penalty
   end
   unless @assignment.is_penalty_calculated
     @assignment.update_attribute(:is_penalty_calculated, true)
   end
 end


After:

   def calculate_all_penalties(assignment_id)
   .
   .
   .               
   if calculate_for_participants	
     calculate_penatly_attributes(@participant) #Refactored#Removed
       end
     end
     assign_all_penalties(@participant)
   end
   unless @assignment.is_penalty_calculated      #Refactored#Removed
     @assignment.update_attribute(:is_penalty_calculated, true)
   end
 end

New methods:

     def calculate_penatly_attributes(participant)
         penalty_attr1 = {:deadline_type_id => 1,:participant_id => @participant.id, :penalty_points => penalties[:submission]}
         CalculatedPenalty.create(penalty_attr1)
         penalty_attr2 = {:deadline_type_id => 2,:participant_id => @participant.id, :penalty_points => penalties[:review]}
         CalculatedPenalty.create(penalty_attr2)
         penalty_attr3 = {:deadline_type_id => 5,:participant_id => @participant.id, :penalty_points => penalties[:meta_review]}
         CalculatedPenalty.create(penalty_attr3)
     end   

    def assign_all_penalties(participant)
     @all_penalties[participant.id] = {}
     @all_penalties[participant.id][:submission] = penalties[:submission]
     @all_penalties[participant.id][:review] = penalties[:review]
     @all_penalties[participant.id][:meta_review] = penalties[:meta_review]
     @all_penalties[participant.id][:total_penalty] = @total_penalty
   end


Removal of non-functional code :

Before:

     if(penalties[:submission] != 0 || penalties[:review] != 0 || penalties[:meta_review] != 0)
       unless penalties[:submission]
         penalties[:submission] = 0
       end
       unless penalties[:review]
         penalties[:review] = 0
       end
       unless penalties[:meta_review]
         penalties[:meta_review] = 0
       end
       @total_penalty = (penalties[:submission] + penalties[:review] + penalties[:meta_review])


After:

    if(penalties[:submission] != 0 || penalties[:review] != 0 || penalties[:meta_review] != 0)
        @total_penalty = (penalties[:submission] + penalties[:review] + penalties[:meta_review])


Change of language to make it more Ruby friendly:


Before:

  if(penalties[:submission] != 0 || penalties[:review] != 0 || penalties[:meta_review] != 0)

After:

   unless(penalties[:submission].zero? || penalties[:review].zero? || penalties[:meta_review].zero? )
  • WI2 Move the redundant piece of code from conflict_notification & edit methods to a new method list_questions

The conflict_notification method is used to help the instructors decide if one of the reviews are unfair or inaccurate. This was again split into 2 methods with some part of the code which is repeated in another method refactored into a new method.

Before:

  def conflict_notification
   .
   .
   .
   @assignment = Assignment.find(@participant.parent_id)
   @questions = Hash.new
   questionnaires = @assignment.questionnaires
   questionnaires.each {
     |questionnaire|
     @questions[questionnaire.symbol] = questionnaire.questions
   }
   @reviewers_email_hash = Hash.new
   .
   .
   .
 end

After:

   def conflict_notification
   .
   .
   .
   @assignment = Assignment.find(@participant.parent_id)
   #Refactored--> Replaced with a methood call
   list_questions (@assignment)
   @reviewers_email_hash = Hash.new
   .
   .
   .
 end


#Refactored #Created a method which was a duplicate in conflict_notification and edit methods
 def list_questions (assignment)
   @questions = Hash.new
   questionnaires = assignment.questionnaires
   questionnaires.each {
       |questionnaire|
     @questions[questionnaire.symbol] = questionnaire.questions
   }
 end

edit method:

This method is used to edit the questionnaires. This method again has code which is repeated in the conflict_notification method and thus the repeated section was split into a new method.

Before:

   def edit
   @participant = AssignmentParticipant.find(params[:id])
   @assignment = @participant.assignment
   @questions = Hash.new
   questionnaires = @assignment.questionnaires
   questionnaires.each {
     |questionnaire|
     @questions[questionnaire.symbol] = questionnaire.questions
   }
   @scores = @participant.scores(@questions)
 end

After:

   def edit
   @participant = AssignmentParticipant.find(params[:id])
   @assignment = @participant.assignment
   #Refactored--> Replaced with a methood call
   list_questions (@assignment)
   @scores = @participant.scores(@questions)
 end

New method:

#Refactored #Created a method which was a duplicate in conflict_notification and edit methods
 def list_questions (assignment)
   @questions = Hash.new
   questionnaires = assignment.questionnaires
   questionnaires.each {
       |questionnaire|
     @questions[questionnaire.symbol] = questionnaire.questions
   }
 end

Testing Details

There were no exiting test cases for the GradesController. We have added a new spec file 'grades_spec.rb' which covers testing scenario for the newly added method.


UI Testing

Following steps needs to be performed to test this code from UI:
1. Login as instructor. Create a course and an assignment under that course.
2. Keep the has team checkbox checked while creating the assignment. Add a grading rubric to it. Add at least two students as participants to the assignment.
3. Create topics for the assignment.
4. Sign in as one of the students who were added to the assignment.
5. Go to the assignment and sign up for a topic.
6. Submit student's work by clicking 'Your work' under that assignment.
7. Sign in as a different student which is participant of the assignment.
8. Go to Assignments--><assignment name>-->Others' work (If the link is disabled, login as instructor and change the due date of the assignment to current time).
9. Give reviews on first student's work.
10. Login as instructor or first student to look at the review grades.