CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2015/oss E1551 RGS: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
=== Consistent authorization ===
=== Consistent authorization ===
;Problem definition
;Problem definition
:Authorization needs to be checked in the <code>action_allowed</code> method instead of in <code>redirect_when_disallowed</code> at the bottom of the file.  After you move the functionality, check to make sure that no one other than the author of a review (or another team member, in the case of author feedback) can edit it, then remove the <code>redirect_when_disallowed</code> method.
:Authorization needs to be checked in the <code>action_allowed</code> method instead of in <code>redirect_when_disallowed</code> at the bottom of the file.  So the functionality is moved from <code>redirect_when_disallowed</code> to <code>action_allowed</code>. And also it is made sure that no one other than the author of a review (or another team member, in the case of author feedback) can edit it and then removed the <code>redirect_when_disallowed</code> method.
;Solution summary
;Solution summary
:
:
=== Refactor get_content ===
=== Refactor get_content ===
;Problem definition
;Problem definition

Revision as of 19:00, 31 October 2015

E1551. Refactoring response_controller.rb

Expertiza

ResponseController

The ResponseController manages Responses.

Project Description

Changes

Refactor latestResponseVersion method

Problem definition
latestResponseVersion is misnamed. It returns all versions of a response, and anyway, the method name should use underscores, not camelcase.

Rename get_scores

Problem definition
get_scores has a Java-like name. It should just be scores.

Delete rereview method

Problem definition
The 100+-line method rearview does not seem to be used anymore. The second-round review can be invoked in the same way as the first-round review. Remove it.
Solution summary
The method rearview was deleted.

DRY create and update

Problem definition
create and update use completely different code. Factor the common parts out into a partial, thereby simplifying the methods.
Solution summary
There was not much actual overlap in these two methods. Minimal changes.

Consistent authorization

Problem definition
Authorization needs to be checked in the action_allowed method instead of in redirect_when_disallowed at the bottom of the file. So the functionality is moved from redirect_when_disallowed to action_allowed. And also it is made sure that no one other than the author of a review (or another team member, in the case of author feedback) can edit it and then removed the redirect_when_disallowed method.
Solution summary

Refactor get_content

Problem definition
get_content is a complex method. It should be renamed to content and simplified. Comments should be added explaining what it does.
Solution summary
The get_content method was renamed set_content, simplified, and documented with comments.

Remove SQL queries

Problem definition
This class contains SQL queries. Please change them to Active Record commands.
Solution summary
No SQL queries were identified. No changes.

Tests

Contact: Ed Gehringer, efg@ncsu.edu What it does: response_controller.rb manages Responses. A Response is what is generated any time a user fills out a rubric--any rubric. This includes review rubrics, author-feedback rubrics, teammate-review rubrics, quizzes, and surveys. Responses come in versions. Any time an author revises work, and the reviewer comes back to review it, a new Response object is generated. This Response object points to a particular ReponseMap, which tells who the reviewer is, which team is the reviewee, and what the reviewed entity is. What needs to be done:

Please write some functional tests for this class.