KCU/04/Group 1: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Topic 2: How do people grow?
Topic 2: How do people grow?
Question: Do more research into the four models of spiritual growth discussed in How People Grow & give a more detailed explanation & support for each of the models. Then, in light of your research, which model(s) of how people grow would you choose & why? (If the group cannot come to a consensus, feel free to have different group members each express their own opinions.)
Question: Do more research into the four models of spiritual growth discussed in How People Grow & give a more detailed explanation & support for each of the models. Then, in light of your research, which model(s) of how people grow would you choose & why? (If the group cannot come to a consensus, feel free to have different group members each express their own opinions.)
'''The Sin Model'''
“Every person’s suffering is indicative of the measure of his guilt in the eyes of God. In the abstract, this conclusion appeared inescapable, logically imperative and theologically satisfying. Hence, in the context of such theology, theodicy was not a problem because its solution was self-evident. But what was thus theologically self-evident and unassailable in the abstract was often, as in the case of Job, in radical tension with actual human experience. There were those whose godliness was genuine, whose moral character was upright and who, though not sinless, had kept themselves from great transgression, but who nonetheless were made to suffer bitterly. For these the self-evident theology brought no consolation and offered no guidance. It only gave rise to a great enigma. And the God to whom the sufferer was accustomed to turn in moments of need and distress became himself the overwhelming enigma. In the speeches of chs. 3-37, we hear on the one hand flawless logic but wounding thrusts of those who insisted on the ‘orthodox’ theology, and on the other hand the writhing soul of the righteous sufferer who struggles with the great enigma. In addition he suffers from the wounds inflicted by his well-intended friends (see note on 5:27). Here, then, we have a graphic portrayal of the unique form of the problem of theodicy as experienced by the righteous sufferers within orthodox Israel.”
“The ‘solution’ offered is also uniquely Israelite—or, better said, Biblical. The relationship between God and man is not exclusive and closed. A third party intrudes, the great adversary (see chs. 1-2). Incapable of contending with God hand to hand, power pitted against power, he is bent on frustrating God’s enterprise embodied in the creation and centered on the God-man relationship" (Intro to Job).
'''Bibliography'''
Introduction to Job. The NIV Study Bible. Ed. Kenneth Barker. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1995. 272-274.

Revision as of 19:44, 24 September 2007

Topic 2: How do people grow? Question: Do more research into the four models of spiritual growth discussed in How People Grow & give a more detailed explanation & support for each of the models. Then, in light of your research, which model(s) of how people grow would you choose & why? (If the group cannot come to a consensus, feel free to have different group members each express their own opinions.)

The Sin Model “Every person’s suffering is indicative of the measure of his guilt in the eyes of God. In the abstract, this conclusion appeared inescapable, logically imperative and theologically satisfying. Hence, in the context of such theology, theodicy was not a problem because its solution was self-evident. But what was thus theologically self-evident and unassailable in the abstract was often, as in the case of Job, in radical tension with actual human experience. There were those whose godliness was genuine, whose moral character was upright and who, though not sinless, had kept themselves from great transgression, but who nonetheless were made to suffer bitterly. For these the self-evident theology brought no consolation and offered no guidance. It only gave rise to a great enigma. And the God to whom the sufferer was accustomed to turn in moments of need and distress became himself the overwhelming enigma. In the speeches of chs. 3-37, we hear on the one hand flawless logic but wounding thrusts of those who insisted on the ‘orthodox’ theology, and on the other hand the writhing soul of the righteous sufferer who struggles with the great enigma. In addition he suffers from the wounds inflicted by his well-intended friends (see note on 5:27). Here, then, we have a graphic portrayal of the unique form of the problem of theodicy as experienced by the righteous sufferers within orthodox Israel.” “The ‘solution’ offered is also uniquely Israelite—or, better said, Biblical. The relationship between God and man is not exclusive and closed. A third party intrudes, the great adversary (see chs. 1-2). Incapable of contending with God hand to hand, power pitted against power, he is bent on frustrating God’s enterprise embodied in the creation and centered on the God-man relationship" (Intro to Job).

Bibliography Introduction to Job. The NIV Study Bible. Ed. Kenneth Barker. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1995. 272-274.