CSC 379:Week 5, Group 2: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(add of initial content)
 
(→‎Related External Links: add of nytimes link from this week's news)
Line 8: Line 8:
* [http://www.eac.gov/ United States Election Assistance Commission]
* [http://www.eac.gov/ United States Election Assistance Commission]
* [http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2003/02/57831 Voting Software Firm Gets Sued - WIRED]
* [http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2003/02/57831 Voting Software Firm Gets Sued - WIRED]
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/28/us/28vote.html?ex=1343620800&en=985acc7423727bdf&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink New York Times - Scientists’ Tests Hack Into Electronic Voting Machines in California and Elsewhere]


===Related Class Website Links===
===Related Class Website Links===
* [http://ethics.csc.ncsu.edu/risks/reliability/voting/electronic/ http://ethics.csc.ncsu.edu/risks/reliability/voting/electronic/]
* [http://ethics.csc.ncsu.edu/risks/reliability/voting/electronic/ http://ethics.csc.ncsu.edu/risks/reliability/voting/electronic/]

Revision as of 01:06, 2 August 2007

Certification Processes for E-Voting Systems

Recently there have been many concerns about the certification processes for e-voting systems such as the inability to determine methods used during the certification process and what parts of the e-voting system were not adequately tested. Examine concerns surrounding the certification processes and their ethical implications. Provide links to groups that have investigated the problems you cite and if possible, responses made by the manufacturer/provider of the e-voting system and/or voting district(s) that use the system.

Briefly discuss how individuals and groups have participated in whistleblowing on this topic (methods used, actions taken).

Related External Links

Related Class Website Links