CSC 379 SUM2008:Week 3, Group 1: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


== Arguments For The Use of These Markets ==
== Arguments For The Use of These Markets ==
* ''Software will become more secure.'' By rewarding individuals for their time and effort, people are given an incentive to expose and report more bugs. As these bugs are fixed, software becomes more robust and safer to use.
* ''They will make it easier to report a bug.'' Markets will facilitate people who would otherwise not come forward with bugs due to frustration with reporting them the software vendors in the past.[http://news.cnet.com/Oracle-dragging-heels-on-unfixed-flaws%2C-researcher-says/2100-1002_3-5795533.html]


== Additional Links ==
== Additional Links ==

Revision as of 22:47, 25 July 2008

Markets for Bug Reports

Is it good to encourage the formation of a market for bug reports where people who find bugs could be paid for their efforts? How about the danger that hackers might outbid developers and use this information and exploit the bug to reek havoc on users of the application? Can this danger be avoided by regulating the market? How can such of regulation succeed in practice? What about the problem of markets in other countries? In response to these concerns should software companies establish a policy of refusing to pay for bug reports?

Arguments For The Use of These Markets

  • Software will become more secure. By rewarding individuals for their time and effort, people are given an incentive to expose and report more bugs. As these bugs are fixed, software becomes more robust and safer to use.
  • They will make it easier to report a bug. Markets will facilitate people who would otherwise not come forward with bugs due to frustration with reporting them the software vendors in the past.[1]

Additional Links

Retrieved from "https://wiki.expertiza.ncsu.edu/index.php?title=CSC_379_SUM2008:Week_3,_Group_1&oldid=15688"