CSC/ECE 517 Summer 2008/wiki3 1 th: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
=Links=
=Links=
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ORM&btnG=Google+Search
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ORM&btnG=Google+Search
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-relational_mapping
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hibernate_%28Java%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_object-relational_mapping_software
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-relational_impedance_mismatch
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=RDB+OO+patterns+faq&btnG=Search
http://ootips.org/persistent-objects.html

Revision as of 23:36, 22 July 2008

RDB/OO Patterns

It would be good if o-o programs could interact with o-o databases, but alas, relational databases have a 99% market share. This has led to many attempts to access them from o-o languages. Design patterns for doing this have been developed, starting with "crossing chasms" and extending to Rails' ActiveRecord. Investigate the various approaches for marrying o-o programs to relational databases, comparing them in terms of ease of programming, robustness, and efficiency.


Overview

Approaches

Comparison

Ease of Programming

Robustness

Efficiency

Summary

Links

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ORM&btnG=Google+Search http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-relational_mapping http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hibernate_%28Java%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_object-relational_mapping_software http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-relational_impedance_mismatch http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=RDB+OO+patterns+faq&btnG=Search http://ootips.org/persistent-objects.html