CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2019 - E1985. Let course staff and students do reviews: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Peer review is a great way for students to learn about how well they have developed their application. However there are some problems with this: | Peer review is a great way for students to learn about how well they have developed their application. However there are some problems with this: | ||
* Sometimes, the peer reviews may not be thorough and the team/person's work reviewed might not reflect the actual status of the development. | * Sometimes, the peer reviews may not be thorough and the team/person's work reviewed might not reflect the actual status of the development. | ||
* The reviewer might not know how well they are reviewing the peers work. They might not entirely know | * The reviewer might not know how well they are reviewing the peers work. They might not entirely know what tone to use or what suggestion to make. | ||
By letting course staff perform reviews as well, the reviewer and the reviewee both benefit, improving the overall learning experience. | By letting course staff perform reviews as well, the reviewer and the reviewee both benefit, improving the overall learning experience. | ||
Revision as of 00:38, 11 November 2019
Problem Statement
Peer review is a great way for students to learn about how well they have developed their application. However there are some problems with this:
- Sometimes, the peer reviews may not be thorough and the team/person's work reviewed might not reflect the actual status of the development.
- The reviewer might not know how well they are reviewing the peers work. They might not entirely know what tone to use or what suggestion to make.
By letting course staff perform reviews as well, the reviewer and the reviewee both benefit, improving the overall learning experience.