CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2019 - E1985. Let course staff and students do reviews: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Hello World") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== '''Problem Statement''' == | |||
Peer review is a great way for students to learn about how well they have developed their application. However there are some problems with this: | |||
* Sometimes, the peer reviews may not be thorough and the team/person's work reviewed might not reflect the actual status of the development. | |||
* The reviewer might not know how well they are reviewing the peers work. They might not entirely know as to what tone to use or what suggestions to put forward. | |||
By letting course staff perform reviews as well, the reviewer and the reviewee both benefit, improving the overall learning experience. | |||
=== Current scenario === | |||
Revision as of 00:36, 11 November 2019
Problem Statement
Peer review is a great way for students to learn about how well they have developed their application. However there are some problems with this:
- Sometimes, the peer reviews may not be thorough and the team/person's work reviewed might not reflect the actual status of the development.
- The reviewer might not know how well they are reviewing the peers work. They might not entirely know as to what tone to use or what suggestions to put forward.
By letting course staff perform reviews as well, the reviewer and the reviewee both benefit, improving the overall learning experience.